lunes, 19 de marzo de 2012

Momias de animales

Según Brier, los egipcios momificaban todo tipo de animales desde ratones a bueyes y los clasifica en 4 grupos, dependiendo de los objetivos, en el primer grupo estarían las mascotas, que al morir eran momificadas y enterradas con verdadero cariño: en el segundo grupo staríam los animales que se mataban y que se momificaban, enterrándolos para que sirvieran de comida al difunto; en trecer lugar estarían los animales sagrados, a los que se momificaba para ofrecerlos como ofrendas a los dioses y en cuatro lugar estarían los animales sagrados que eran omificados cuando morian por causas naturales.
Sobre el perro Davis

Davies en la tumba KV50 encontró la momia de este perro junto con otras momias de monos y patos. El perro mide 0,17 cm. de alto y 56 cm. de largo.

Davies relata como encontró la momia:

“Descendí por el pozo y entré en la cámara, la cual reveló una temperatura extremadamente alta y un techo demasiado bajo. Me asusté cuando vi cerca de mí un perro amarillo de tamaño natural levantado sobre sus patas, con su corta cola ondulada detrás y sus ojos abiertos. A pocos centímetros enfrente de él había un mono sentado, en perfectas condiciones; durante un momento pensé que estaban vivos, pero en seguida observé que habían sido momificados y que los antiguos saqueadores los habían despojado de sus vendajes. Evidentemente habían sentado al mono sobre un fragmento de su sarcófago de madera y habían colocado al perro frente a él, casi tocándose con los hocicos. Creo que los ladrones los colocaron de esta manera para divertirse. O sea que podríamos decir que debe de ser una broma de hace 3.000 años”. En la misma sala 53 del Museo Egipcio de El Cairo se encuentra la momia del inocente monito que durante más de treinta siglos sirvió de objeto de broma al tenebroso paso del tiempo en la oscuridad de una tumba tebana.”

domingo, 11 de marzo de 2012


THE CRADLE of the history of medicine in the Old World is to be found in Ancient
Egypt and Nubia. Abundant data is available from medical papyri, mummies,
osseous remains, literature and art and extends from prehistoric to Graeco-Roman
times. The range of pathological processes afflicting the Ancient Egyptians and
Nubians has been extended with the description of more material. However, most
excavators, particularly those in the period 1890 to 1920 paid little attention to the
bones of the post cranial skeleton unless the changes were gross and this has restricted
our knowledge of their pathology (Salib, 1967). Even if all post cranial bones were
examined by the most modem techniques, the palaeopathologist is still limited by the
number of ways bone can react to a pathological stimulus. Thus, only tentative
conclusions may be possible, yet they can be extended if soft tissue was also present
(Bourke, 1967; Sandison, 1968).
The building of the Aswan Dam has stimulated further anthropological and palaeopathological
study of these peoples and provoked reassessment of many aspects of
their culture and biology. In this paper the palaeopathology of the vertebral column
from prehistoric to Roman times will be discussed and an attempt made to evaluate
the present extent of our knowledge.
The vertebral column is comprised of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae as
well as the sacrum and coccyx. The palaeopathology will be discussed using Wells'
classification (1964):
1. Genetic
2. Intra-uterine malformation.
1. Trauma
2. Degenerative diseases
3. Neoplasia
4. Non-specific infections
5. Specific infections
6. Endocrine and metabolic disorders.
1. Genetic Disease
Brothwell and Powers (1968) commented upon the difficulty of establishing the true
frequency of congenital malformations in man. This was well demonstrated in the
J. B. Bourke
vertebral column of Ancient Egyptians and Nubians as the majority of specimens
were never saved or studied (Elliot Smith and Wood Jones, 1910; Salib, 1967).
Elliot Smith and Wood Jones (1910), however, have partly remedied this defect.
They found six examples of assimilation of the atlas into the occiput out of 6,000
Nubian specimens. Great variation in the characteristics of the lateral masses of the
atlas and the foramina for the vertebral artery were recorded but no incidence was
given. Congenital fusion of vertebrae was also found in all regions of the vertebral
column and six examples of cervical rib were reported.
In achondroplasia, a genetic dominant disease, the length of the vertebral column
is normal, but the ossification centres of the vertebral bodies may be smaller than
normal. Often a long regular kyphosis in the dorso-lumbar region may be present.
Occasionally all the lumbar vertebrae are included in the kyphosis and the sacrum
can be horizontal. Early synostosis between the vertebral body and the neural arch
can occur and it may be so severe that there is a marked reduction in vertebral canal
size (Mercer and Duthie, 1964).
Several examples of dwarfs were described in Ancient Egypt and Nubia and
attributed to achondroplasia. A sixth-dynasty carving of Seneb at Gizah showed a
dwarf contrasted with normal-sized wife and children. Further drawings of dwarfs
were found on a fifth-dynasty tomb at Deshasheh. Ruffer (1911) reported the fifthdynasty
statuette of Chnoum-hotep from Saqqarah and also a predynastic drawing of
the 'dwarf of Zer' from Abydos. Osseous remains attributable to achondroplasia were
reported by Jones (1932), Bleyer (1940) and MacIver (1901), but changes in the
vertebral column were not noted. This relative profusion of dwarfs may be explained
by the exalted position which they occupied at court (Johnston, 1963).
Rowling (1967) reported on two femora, two radii and ulnae, pelvis, sacrum and
lumbar vertebrae from a predynastic individual of Nubia. The sacrum and lumbar
vertebrae were noted to be dense and hard; and a posterior defect in the neural arch
was present in the upper two sacral segments. Rowling concluded that these changes
could result from ectopic ossification secondary to paraplegia, but Brothwell (1967b)
rejected this and suggested osteogenesis imperfecta (a genetic dominant disease) as a
possible diagnosis.
2. Intra-uterine Malformation
Barclay-Smith (1911) reported in detail the remains of an incomplete skeleton of a
young adult female from Saqqarah. It was inadequately dated and may be Ptolemaic
or earlier. All regions of the vertebral column showed anomalies. For example there
were eight cervical vertebrae with synostosis of the atlas to the occiput. The axis and
third cervical vertebra were fused into one mass. The thoracic region showed the
opposed articular facets of the eleventh and twelfth vertebrae to be lumbar in type.
The lumbar vertebrae and sacrum were scoliotic and part of the neural arch of the
fifth lumbar vertebra was an independent ossicle. The opinion was advanced that these
changes resulted from excessive use. Wells (1964), however, was of the opinion that
it was an example of the Klippel-Feil syndrome: a developmental defect of mesoderm.
Brothwell and Powers (1968) reported a possible example of anencephaly in a
well-preserved Egyptian mummy from the catacombs at Hermopolis. They reproduced
Palaeopathology of the Vertebral Column in Ancient Egypt and Nubia
the original drawings and study of them suggested that the upper region of the vertebral
column may show non-union of the neural arches. Further examination of this
mummy including radiological study is required before it may be accepted with
1. Trauma
The earliest written clinical record was produced in Ancient Egypt and Nubia as
two medical documents or papyri which were discovered in 1862. Dawson (1932) has
related how they were found and commented upon the confusion over their titles. The
Ebers Papyrus, originally the better-known document, is a collection of extracts from
about forty different sources. It contained a few sections on symptoms and diagnosis
and the concluding part was surgical, relating to the treatment of wounds and sores.
Dawson dismissed it as being without merit as a scientific medical record.
The second or Edwin Smith Papyrus (Breasted, 1930) has two distinct parts.
It was written between 3,000 and 2,500 B.C. when the pyramids were being built. The
first part was a surgical handbook which contained much information about the
treatment of traumatic lesions, particularly those of the skull and vertebral column:
the second being a miscellaneous collection of recipes and charms similar to the bulk
of the Ebers and other papyri (Dawson, 1932 and 1953) and need not concern us
Traumatic injury to the vertebral column is extensively described in the first part
of the Edwin Smith Papyrus. Unfortunately the text is incomplete and breaks off in
mid-sentence. Dawson (1932 and 1953) suggested that the present papyrus is but a
copy of the original. It recorded the details of over forty-eight wounds and fractures
classified in an orderly manner from head to foot in the style of the later Greek medical
books. Details are presented in the systematic order of title, examination, diagnosis,
prognosis and treatment. Jottings are present and Power (1933) attributed them to a
seventeenth-century B.C. surgeon who added them to the original text. The full
significance of each description may only become apparent when they are interpreted.
However, this has not always resolved doubt (Dawson, 1932).
The nature of the jottings suggested that the writer was stimulated to investigate
patients he could not cure and Jones (1922) noted that the scientific rather than the
physicianly attitude was adopted: more attention was given to the natural history of
the injury than to diagnosis.
Case 31 of the Papyrus detailed a dislocation of the cervical column with an associated
injury of the spinal cord (Breasted, 1930):
Instmctions concerning a dislocation in a vertebra of his neck. If thou examinest a man having
a dislocation in a vertebra of his neck, shouldest thou find him unconscious of his two arms
and his two legs on account of it, whilst his penis is erect on account of it and urine drops from
his member without his knowing it; his flesh has recived wind; his two eyes are bloodshot.
It is a dislocation of the vertebra of the neck-extending to his backbone which causes him to be
unconscious of his two arms and his two legs. If, however, the middle vertebra of his neck is
dislocated it is an emissio seminis which befalls his penis. Thou shouldest say concerning him
'One having a dislocation in a vertebra of his neck while he is unconscious of his two legs and
his two arms and his urine dribbles. An ailment not to be treated'.
J. B. Bourke
In the above account priapism was noted and ileus recorded. Further examples
showed that the author was able to distinguish between the dislocation of a cervical
vertebra with and without an associated injury of the spinal cord. In one example it is
noted (Breasted, 1930):
Instructions concerning a displacement in a vertebra in his neck. If thou examinest a man having
a displacement in a vertebra of his neck, whose face is fixed, whose neck cannot turn for him
and thou shouldest say to him 'Look at thy breast and thy two shoulders' and he is unable to
turn his face that he may look at his breast and his two shoulders. Thou shouldest say concerning
him 'One having a displacement in a vertebra of his neck. An ailment which I will treat'.
This is a description of a sprain of the cervical column (Power, 1933). Subsequently a
fracture dislocation was described thus (Breasted, 1930):
Instructions concerning a crushed vertebra in his neck. If thou examinest a man having a crushed
vertebra in his neck and thou findest that one vertebra has fallen into the next one, while he is
voiceless and cannot speak; his head falling downwards, has caused that one vertebra crush into
the next one; and shouldest thou find that he is unconscious of his two arms and his two legs
because of it Thou shouldest say concerning him 'One having a crushed vertebra in his neck;
he is unconscious of his two arms and his two legs and he is speechless. An ailment not to be
The above passage also included a description of a crush fracture of a cervical vertebra.
These descriptions which were made about 4,500 years ago have not been improved
upon in their basic conception of the nature of the injury and their effect.
Several examples of skull fractures were recorded and the development of neck
stiffness was accurately described (Breasted, 1930):
If thou examinest a man having a gaping wound in his head penetrating to the bone, and
smashing his skull: thou shouldest palpate his wound. Shouldest thou find that smash which is
in his skull deep and sunken under thy fingers whilst the swelling which is over it protrudes, he
discharges blood from both his nostrils and both his ears and he suffers with stiffness in his
neck so that he is unable to look at his two shoulders and his breast. Thou shouldest say regarding
him 'One having a gaping wound in his head penetrating to the bone and smashing his skull
while he suffers with stiffness in his neck. An ailment not to be treated'.
Neck stiffness could be associated with the original injury but alternatively it might be
secondary to meningitic infection.
Case 48, the last case of the papyrus noted a sprain in the spinal column and examination
of the patient by straight-leg raising. The treatment recommended was: 'thou
shouldest place him flat on his back: thou shouldest make for him...' and the papyrus
then abruptly ended.
The sophistication of the Ancient Egyptians and Nubians in being able to describe,
understand and treat the injuries recorded in the Papyrus was marked. Little improvement
has been made in the last 4,500 years on the simplicity of their descriptions.
Elliot Smith and Wood Jones (1910) in their survey of Nubia found no example of a
healed spinal fracture. However, they reported two specimens with evidence of
traumatic injury to the vertebral column. One was an adult woman from Shellal and
dated to the late predynastic period. This showed a transverse track through the
lower margin of the twelfth thoracic vertebral body. Signs of osteitis were also present
Palaeopathology of the Vertebral Column in Ancient Egypt and Nubia
and they suggested that this injury might have been caused by a small spear. The
second specimen came from the early predynastic cemetery at Shem Nishai, Dehmit.
This showed several grooved wounds on the posterior arch of the atlas and the other
cervical vertebrae which were attributed to trauma just prior to death. These specimens
merit critical re-examination.
Examples ofmany individual spinal fractures are preserved in the Nubian collection
of the Royal College of Surgeons of England (Rowling, 1967). However, they are
interesting isolated specimens and data about the population from which they came is
2. Degenerative Diseases
The palaeopathology of the degenerative diseases in the vertebral column in Ancient
Egypt and Nubia has been confused by muddled terminology and lack of understanding
of the anatomy and pathology of the joints involved (Bourke, 1967 and 1971;
Wells, 1964; Sandison, 1968). The vertebral column is composed of a line of fibrocartilagenous
joints between the vertebral bodies. The articular processes of adjacent
vertebrae form synovial joints. Degeneration has different effects in these two types
of joint.
Osteophytic outgrowths or lipping occurs at the margins of the vertebral bodies and
it has been suggested that osteophytosis should be the name reserved for this pathology
(Bourke, 1967 and 1970). Osteoarthritic eburnations occur at the synovial apophyseal
joints of the vertebral column. Osteoarthritis may be used to describe the degenerative
disease in synovial joints.
Confusion was created by Elliot Smith and Wood Jones (1910) who stated that
'rheumatoid arthritis is par excellence the bone disease of Ancient Egypt and Nubia'.
Some assumed that the disease of modem clinical practice was being described, but
examination of the original text showed the pathology to be that of osteoarthritis
and osteophytosis. Ruffer (1918) added to the difficulty by reporting 'arthritis deformans
and spondylitis in Ancient Egyptians'. Examples of osteophytosis with bony
ankylosis were reported and interpreted as showing that ankylosing spondylitis, an
uncommon disease in modern clinical practice, was rampant. Zorab (1961) examined
radiologically eight British Museum bodies of the New Kingdom and Roman Period
from Egypt and found no case of ankylosing spondylitis. Osteophytosis was present
in four. He noted the different age distributions between osteoarthritis and osteophytosis
on the one hand and ankylosing spondylitis on the other. Zorab appeared to
think that the spondylitis of former authors corresponded with osteoarthritis and
osteophytosis. Sandison (1968) and Wells (1964) concurred with this opinion. However,
Rowling (1961) still used the term 'ankylosing spondylitis', but Sandison (1968)
noted that the pathology described was that of osteoarthritis and osteophytosis.
Osteoarthritis involving the synovial joints of the vertebral column has been reported
by Elliot Smith and Wood Jones (1910), Ruffer (1918), Ruffer and Rietti
(1912), and Salib (1962). These were all reports of selected specimens. Armelagos
(1969) analysed the incidence of synovial joint arthritis in the vertebral column in a
series from Nubia which spanned the period from Meroitic to Christian (350 B.C. to
as late as A.D. 1300). He found differences between the various groups and accounted
J. B. Bourke
for these by changes in the age structure of those studied. It has been well shown in
both modern clinical studies (Kellgren, 1961) and in palaeopathological investigations
that osteoarthritis increased with age (Inglemark, M0ller-Christensen and Brinch,
Bourke (1967 and 1971) reported a series of vertebral columns from Ancient Eygpt
and Nubia. They were excavated during the 1898 and 1899 seasons. The 1899 part of
the collection came from Hou (Petrie, 1901) and was dated to about 1500 B.C. The
1898 material came from various sites and ranged from prehistoric or early dynastic
to Roman times. Unfortunately, the material was divorced from the other post cranial
bones and the skulls and thus, sexing and ageing were impossible. Pathology other
than osteophytosis was excluded from his study.
The specimens from Hou numbered 132 and showed two peaks of severe involvement
with osteophytosis; one in the cervical and the other in the lumbar region. The
other Egyptian series showed a similar pattem. On account of this similarity both
groups were pooled and compared with other data which showed that an Iron Age
British Series had a similar pattern to those of the Ancient Egyptians and Nubians.
This contrasted with a modem English series from St. Bride's Church in Fleet Street,
London, which showed marked severe osteophytosis of the cervical column and also
some severe changes in the thoracic and lumbar regions. A similar pattem was reported
in modem American Whites (Stewart, 1966). Comparison with Stewart's
(1947 and 1966) data for the Eskimos and Pueblo Indians indicated that the latter had
a similar osteophytic distribution to that of the Ancient Egyptians and Nubians.
However, little osteophytosis was present in the Eskimos except in the lumbar region.
Further analysis of the Egyptian data by Bourke (1971) showed that the area of the
vertebral column with the greatest incidence and severity of involvement with osteophytosis
was the lumbar region in both the Hou and the pooled Egyptian series.
Similar findings were obtained in three other series from England (Bourke, 1971).
In spite of some Ancient Egyptian and Nubian vertebral columns showing severe
osteophytosis it was unjustified to assume minor or major incapacity (Bourke, 1971).
Armelagos (1969) reported the frequency of osteophytosis in his series and found, in
common with other workers, (McKem and Stewart, 1957; Willis, 1924; Inglemark et
al., 1959; Bourke, 1967; and Kellgren, 1961) that it increased with age. He also noted
that in people who live longer their vertebrae were subjected to stress for a longer
With increasing numbers of population studies of the vertebral column, more will
become known of the biology of osteoarthritis and osteophytosis. No advance in this
field can be made by repeated description of single specimens. The techniques of
population biology must be increasingly applied to the skeletal remains from Ancient
Egypt and Nubia.
Wells (1964) in his classification included two further diseases, rheumatoid arthritis
and ankylosing spondylitis in his group of degenerative diseases. Bourke (1967) was
unable to find any example of rheumatoid arthritis. However, examples may have
been overlooked as the early stages of the disease may only be detected radiologically.
Zorab (1961) in a review of the historical background of ankylosing spondylitis
described an X-ray investigation of eight mummies which has been referred to above.
Palaeopathology of the Vertebral Column in Ancient Egypt and Nubia
He found no proven case of ankylosing spondylitis. Bourke (1967) reported three
examples. One was from Cemetery B at Hou (Petrie, 1901) and the spine was completely
ankylosed from the axis to the sacrum. The typical radiological signs including
calcification of the anterior spinal ligaments and bony fusion of the apophyseal joints
were present. He also described a further case from Hou of six fused mid-thoracic
vertebrae and one from the New Race Cemetery at Naqada comprising the five lumbar
vertebrae and part of the sacrum. These two examples also showed the characteristic
radiological and macroscopical changes of ankylosing spondylitis (Bourke, 1967).
3. Neoplasia
In contemporary pathology primary neoplasia in the vertebral column is rare,
while secondary deposits are far more common being typically lytic rather than
sclerotic. Consequently the disease process that it is desired to study destroys its own
evidence. Derry (1909) reported the remains of one Middle Nubian (C Group) burial.
The vertebrae, particularly those of the cervical region, were fragmented by a 'rarifying
osteitis'. The left humerus, clavicle and scapula and the sternum showed similar
lesions. Re-examination of this material is needed before the changes can be accepted
as possibly due to secondary neoplasm (Brothwell, 1967a).
Elliot Smith and Derry (1910) reported a middle Nubian male skeleton in which the
sacrum had been extensively eroded and suggested that this was caused by rectal
cancer or possibly a chordoma.
Elliot Smith and Dawson (1924) illustrated an upper lumber vertebra from Nubia
with an ill-defined cavity within the cancellous tissue of its body. The defect was
situated in the midline and opened on the anterior surface. They considered this to be
tuberculous. Rowling (1960) was critical and suggested that the lesion might be neoplastic.
He claimed that the strength of the surrounding bone without inflammatory
changes and the position of the lesion being in the body of the vertebra and not in
the intervertebral disc region, supported his view. His opinion was that the radiographic
appearances were suggestive of a haemangioma or erosion by an aortic
aneurysm. Further assessment of these three specimens showing changes that may be
attributable to a neoplasm need further study before they can be accepted without
4. Non-speciJfic infection
Many bones from Ancient Egypt and Nubia including those of the vertebral
column showed the changes of non-specific inflammation (Ruffer, 1921; Moodie,
1923; Wells, 1964). It was a common condition yet its nature and significance have
remained obscure. Wells (1964) and Putschar (1966) were doubtful about its significance.
It has been suggested that it was either a response to infection or trauma;
however, Sandison (1968) was of the opinion that it was impossible to reach a conclusion
about its significance.
In summary, non-specific inflammatory changes were seen in the bones of the
vertebral column in Ancient Egypt and Nubia, but it would seem impossible to assess
their significance in the present state of our knowledge. This latter point should be
stressed. Mantle (1959) has pointed a way for future study with his description of the
J. B. Bourke
clinical and radiological findings in patients with non-tuberculous infections of the
spine. He reported detectable radiological signs in spondylitis from acute pyogenic
infection, typhoid, brucellosis, syphilis, yaws, fungus infections and hydatid disease. A
comparative radiological study of palaeopathological specimens might be the first step
in establishing the nature of the changes at present attributed to non-specific infection.
5. Specific Infections
(a) Tuberculosis
Bourke (1967) in reviewing the causative organisms of infective lesions of the
vertebral column in contemporaneous clinical practice noted that the tubercule
bacillus was the invariable infecting agent. Sepsis from other organisms was very rare.
The typical late pathological changes produced by tuberculous infection in the
vertebral column was Pott's Disease. This resulted in bony ankylosis of areas of the
vertebral column. The enthusiasm to equate all infective bone pathology in the vertebral
column with tuberculosis must be tempered by Luck's (1950) comment that 'The
clinical diagnosis of skeletal tuberculosis is not a simple matter, and according to
published statistics a substantial percentage of error occurs even in the best orthopaedic
clinics'. Girdlestone (1940) and Steindler (1952) were of a similar opinion. However,
the danger of extrapolation from modern to former times must be acknowledged.
Unmistakable evidence of tuberculosis of the vertebral column was found in the
21st-dynasty mummy Nesperehan. (Elliot Smith and Ruffer, 1910; and Cave 1939).
There was destruction of the lower thoracic and upper lumbar vertebrae which created
an angular kyphotic deformity. A right psoas abscess cavity was present but acid fast
bacilli could not be demonstrated. Sandison (1968) on reviewing the available data
concluded that this example settled beyond doubt the antiquity of tuberculosis in
Ancient Egypt and Nubia. However, Morse (1967) advanced the opinion that tuberculosis
was established by predynastic times and was certainly in evidence by early
dynastic times.
Derry (1938) reported nine examples of spinal tuberculosis and Salib (1962) noted
that the lumbar region was the area of the vertebral column most frequently involved.
Rowling (1960) reported four further specimens showing presumed spinal tuberculosis
in remains from Nubia. They were re-examined by Morse, Brothwell and Ucko (1964)
who added two further examples. All showed changes compatible with tuberculous
infection. On reviewing all the available evidence Morse and his associates (Morse,
Brothwell and Ucko, 1964) accepted thirty-one examples of spinal tuberculosis in
Ancient Egypt and Nubia dating as far back as 3000 B.C.
It is probable that the presently known specimens represented but a small number
of the total population afflicted with tuberculosis. However, if Luck's caution was
valid in Ancient Egypt and Nubia even the thirty-one cases at present accepted would
be reduced; some being reclassified as due to staphylococci.
(b) Leprosy
Leprosy is another specific disease caused by a mycobacterium; and there has been
confusion about its diagnosis in palaeopathological specimens which Moller-Christensen
(1961) has done much to resolve. The first reported example in Ancient Egypt and
Palaeopathology of the Vertebral Column in Ancient Egypt and Nubia
Nubia was of an early Christian period specimen which showed the typical changes
in the hands and feet (Elliot Smith and Dawson, 1924); no changes were present in the
vertebral column.
(c) Syphilis
No clear evidence for the existence of syphilis in Ancient Egypt and Nubia was
recorded in the large amount of skeletal remains which have so far been examined
(Sandison, 1968).
(d) Poliomyelitis
Poliomyelitis is a viral infection which attacks the anterior horn cells of the spinal
column. The presence of this infection in palaeopathological material can only be
inferred from the presence of deformity in those who survived the acute phase of the
disease. Mitchell (1900) reported an early Egyptian specimen from Deshasheh with
shortening of the left leg which he ascribed to poliomyelitis. Sandison (1968) was
unimpressed with this and two further examples: one described by Elliot Smith (1912:
the club foot of Pharaoh Siptah) and the other by Cameron (1910, the foot deformity
of Khnumu-Nekht). It is possible that the deformity might be due to poliomyelitis,
but this diagnosis must remain very doubtful. If viral inclusion bodies in the anterior
horn cells of the spinal cord were present with this deformity, more credence might
be given to the tentative diagnosis.
6. Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases
Alkaptonuria was estimated to have an occurrence rate of about one person per
million in the British Isles (Gray, 1967). In this recessive genetic disease the intervertebral
discs can be calcified, the disc space reduced and the adjacent vertebrae may
show rarification on radiological examination. Simon and Zorab (1961) found a
Roman period mummy which showed the radiological changes of the ochronotic
stage of alkaptonuria. With increasing radiological examination of mummies further
examples of this disease were discovered. However, Gray (1967) was subsequently
able to show that the radiological changes were produced by the embalming process
and not by alkaptonuria. This is an excellent example of the care that must be taken
when evaluating new palaeopathological data.
Sandison (1968) and Ghalioungui (1963) were of the opinion that rickets was
unknown in Ancient Egypt,
Dewey (1968) has recently developed a method for the quantitation of osteoporosis.
He used direct measurements of the femoral cortical bone, but this method could
easily be utilized to study vertebrae. He found that the Nubian females showed a rapid
and significant loss of bone compared to males. When the data was corrected for
stature a similar finding was obtained (Armelagos, 1969). The results of further studies
are necessary before an assessment of the usefulness of this technique can be made.
The range of pathology found in the vertebral column in Ancient Egypt and Nubia
has been described. This anatomical structure was selected for review as it comprises
both fibrocartilagenous and synovialjoints which can be studied during the examination
J. B. Bourke
of one group of bones. Since it is also divided morphologically and anatomically
into smaller units, the relative effects of pathological changes on different areas of
the vertebral column can be compared one with the other. This technique has been
used by Stewart (1966), Bourke (1967 and 1971) and Armelagos (1969) and further
exploitation should provide useful data.
There are obviously many blank areas in our knowledge. This has in part been
produced by circumstance. Petrie and his colleagues excavated extensively in the
period around 1900. The principal part of the skeletal remains which they wished to
save was the skull and only the post cranial skeleton if the changes were gross (Salib,
1967). This has produced two limitations. Firstly there are few post cranial bones
with which to associate the skulls and secondly since only gross post cranial pathology
was saved, many of the minor changes were overlooked and the possibility of population
studies rendered impossible. This in part may explain why little data is available
for the congenital anomalies of the vertebral column. It is to be hoped that in future,
if the post cranial bones cannot be saved, they will at least be studied before reinterment
at the site of excavation. Armelagos (1969) used this method in his recent
Nubian excavations.
Throughout all sections of the review the difficulty of diagnosis was apparent. Many
specimens have been described in the past as showing gross and typical pathological
changes. In most the subsequent re-examination has cast doubts on, or even changed
the original diagnosis. Almost without exception re-examination has increased the
doubt about palaeopathology rather than clarified it (Wells, 1964). This is well shown
in the section on neoplasms. It is thus obvious that diagnostic standards are rising.
No longer is a description with a photograph acceptable. Wherever possible the
techniques of the modem pathological laboratory should be used. Radiography, slab
radiography after band saw section, microscopy and electron microscopy are all being
increasingly used (Sandison, 1967 and 1968; Bourke, 1967 and 1971; Armelagos, 1969;
Race et al., 1968).
The care with which interpretation must be undertaken has been demonstrated in
the story of alkaptonuria. Descriptions of a common incidence of this recessive
genetic metabolic disorder started to appear in the literature in about 1960. However,
it was not until Gray (1967) undertook his studies that it was shown that the changes
could be accounted for by the embalming process rather than the genetic disease.
Further demonstration of the care with which studies must be conducted was given
by Morse et al. (1964). They could only accept a very small number of examples of
tuberculosis of the spinal column, many after re-examination. If Luck's comment
about the error in current clinical practice being to overestimate rather than underestimate
the frequency of tuberculosis was applicable to Ancient Egypt and Nubia,
this small group of thirty-one examples would be even further reduced.
The complete scientific objectivity of the palaeopathologist is required to assess the
changes in bones, radiographs and pathological slides. The absence of this attitude
was shown by the possible example of a rectal tumour or a chordoma described by
Eliot Smith and Derry (1910). The latter is exceptionally rare, but was given as the
alternative diagnosis without any other possible differential diagnoses being suggested
or discussed.
Palaeopathology of the Vertebral Column in Ancient Egypt and Nubia
The population studies of Bourke (1967 and 1970) and Armelagos (1969) demonstrated
that the distribution of osteophytosis in Ancient Egypt and Nubia was comparable
with that seen in other populations. It was remarkable that the distribution of
osteophytosis in different populations at different times has shown such a constant
pattern. This degeneration was well known even in palaeontology for the Upper
Pleistocene Neanderthal man from La Chapelle-aux-Saint showed gross changes of
osteophytosis and osteoarthritis (Strauss and Cave, 1957).
Palaeopathology has been increasingly using the detailed methods of modern
pathology (Sandison, 1968). The limitations of previous descriptions are being increasingly
recognized and the uncomfortable task of re-examination undertaken. This
has often increased rather than clarified the doubt and many of the former claims for
specimens cannot now be substantiated. This has reduced the range of pathology that
can be recognised in the Ancient Egyptians and Nubians. Following the present
reduction of accepted palaeopathological specimens the way forward may follow
based on objective description and full scientific investigation.
This review of the palaeopathology of the vertebral column in Ancient Egypt and
Nubia showed that a sophisticated knowledge of trauma of the vertebral column
existed about 5,000 years ago. Infective diseases were present: evidence for tuberculosis
being particularly strong. Syphilis was unknown. Neoplastic disease of the vertebral
column may also have been present. The same degenerative diseases of the fibrocartilagenous
and synovial joints were seen in the Ancient Egyptians and Nubians as
in modern populations.
By re-examination and the application of modern diagnostic methods to specimens
of the vertebral column from Ancient Egypt and Nubia the number of pathological
diagnoses which can withstand criticism has been progressively reduced. However, it
may be that a foundation has been prepared from which the range of pathological
diagnoses can be enlarged and increased with the collection of specimens by excavators
and their detailed scientific examination. Thus may our knowledge of the palaeopathology
of the Ancient Egyptians and Nubians be increased.
The palaeopathology of the vertebral column in Ancient Egypt and Nubia is reviewed.
A refined knowledge of trauma was evident over 4,000 years ago. Population
studies particularly of osteoarthritis and osteophytosis, allowed comparison between
groups to be attempted. After reappraisal the reliability of many former diagnoses
was questioned: with modern techniques greater accuracy may now be possible.
ARMELAGOS, G., 'Diseases in Ancient Nubia', Science, 1969, 163, 255.
BARCLAY-SMIrH, E., 'Multiple anomaly in a vertebral column', J. Anat., 1911, 45, 144.
BLEy3, A., 'The antiquity of achondroplasia', Ann. med. Hist., 1940, 2, 306.
BouRKE, J. B., 'A review of the palaeopathology of the arthritic diseases', chapter 27 in
Diseases in Antiquity, ed. by D. R. Brothwell, and A. T. Sandison, Springfield,
Thomas, 1967.
373 E
J. B. Bourke
BouRKu, J. B., 'Trauma and Degenerative Diseases in Ancient Egypt and Nubia', in The
Population Biology of the Ancient Egyptians and Nubians, ed. by D. R. Brothwell and
B. Chiarelli, Accademie Press, 1971 (in the press).
BREASTS, J. H., The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus, Chicago, University of Chicago Press,
BRoTHWLL, D. R., 'The Evidence for Neoplasms', chapter 24 in Diseases in Antiquity, op.
cit., 1967a.
BROTHWELL, D. R. 'Major Congenital Anomalies of the Skeleton: Evidence from Earlier
Populations', chapter 34 in Diseases in Antiquity, op. cit., 1967b.
BROTHWELL, D. R., and PowEs, R., 'Congenital Malformations of the Skeleton in Earlier
Man', in The Skeletal Biology of Earlier Human Populations, ed. D. R. Brothwell,
London, Pergamon, 1968.
CAMRON, J., 'Report on the anatomy of the mummies', in The Tomb of Two Brothers'
ed. by M. A. Murray, Manchester, Sherrat and Hughes, 1910.
CAvE, A. J. E., 'The Evidence for the incidence of tuberculosis in Ancient Egypt', Brit. J.
Tuberc. Dis. Chest, 1939, 33, 142.
DAWSON, W. R., 'The earliest surgical treatise', Brit. J. Surg., 1932, 20, 34.
DAWSON, W. R., 'The Egyptian Medical Papyri', in Science, Medicine and History: Essays on
the evolution of scientific thought and Medical Practice written in honour of Charles
Singer, ed. by E. A. Underwood, London, Oxford University Press, 1953.
DERRY, D. E., 'Anatomical report', Archaeological Survey of Nubia Bull., 1909, 3, 29.
DERRY, D. E., 'Pott's Disease in Ancient Egypt', Med. Press, 1938, 197, 1.
DEwEY, J. R., Thesis-University of Utah, 1968. Quoted by Armelagos (1969).
Eloar SMrH, G., The Royal Mummies. Catalogue General des Antiquit6s Agyptiennes du
Mus6e du Caire, 1912.
ELIJOT SMrrH, G., and DAWSON, W. R., Egyptian Mummies, London, Allen and Unwin, 1924.
ELLIOT SMrH, G., and DERRY, D. E., 'Anatomical Report', Archaeological Survey of Nubia
Bull., 1910, 5, 11.
FLLOT SMIT, G., and RuFFR, M. A., 'Pott'sche Krankheit an einer Agyptschen Mumie
aus der Zeit der 21 Dynastie (Um 1000 U. Chr.)', in Zur historischen Biologie der
Krankheitserrgen, ed. by Sudhoff and Sticker, Giessen, Heft 3, 1910.
ELLIr SmrrH, G., and WooD JoNEs, F., 'Report on the Human Remains', The Archaeological
Survey of Nubia, 1907-1908, Cairo, National Printing Department, 1910.
GHALIoUNGUI, P., Magic and Medical Science in Ancient Egypt, London, Hodder & Stoughton,
GRDLEToNE, G. R., Tuberculosis of Bone and Joint, New York, Oxford University Press,
GRAY, P. H. K., 'Calcinosis Intervertebralis with special reference to similar changes found
in mummies in Ancient Egypt', Chapter 2 in Diseases in Antiquity, op. cit.
INGLEMARK, B. E., M0LLR-CHRITENsEN, V., and BRINCH, O., 'Spinal joint changes and
dental infections', Acta. Anat., 1959, 38 (Suppl. 36).
JOHSTON, F. E., 'Achondroplastic dwarfs through history', Clin. Pediat., 1963, 2, 703.
JoNES, E. W. A. H., 'Studies in achondroplasia', J. Anat., 1932, 66, 565.
JoNs, W. H. S., Epidemics by Hippocrates, ed. by W. H. S. Jones, Loeb Classical Library,
1922, 1, 144.
KELOREN, J. H., 'Osteoarthritis in patients and populations', Brit. med. J., 1961, U, 1.
LucK, J. V., Bone and Joint Diseases. Springfield, Thomas, 1950.
MACavER, R., The Earliest Inhabitants ofAbydos. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1901.
MANTLE, J. A., 'Non-tuberculous infections of the spine', chapter 7 in Modern Trends in
Diseases ofthe Vertebral Column, ed. by R. Nassim, and H. Jackson Burrows, London,
Butterworth, 1959.
MCKERN, T. W., and STEWART, T. D., Skeletal Changes in Young American Males. Technical
Report. Headquarters Research and Development Command, Natick. Mass, 1957.
MERcER, W., and DuTHE, R. B., Orthopaedic Surgery, London, Arnold, 1964.
Palaeopathology of the Vertebral Column in Ancient Egypt and Nubia
MITCHELL, J. K., 'Study of a mummy affected with anterior poliomyelitis', Trans. Ass. Am.
Physns, 1900, 15, 134.
M 0LLu-CHRLSTENE, V., Bone Changes in Leprosy, Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1961.
MooDm, R. L., Paleopathology. An Introduction to the Study ofAncient Evidences ofDisease,
Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1923.
MoRs, D., 'Tuberculosis', chapter 19 in Diseases in Antiquity, op. cit.
MoRS, D., BRoTHWELL, D. R., and UCKO, P. J., 'Tuberculosis in Ancient Egypt', Amer. Rev.
resp. Dis., 1964, 90, 524.
PETRB, W. M. F., Diospolis Parva (The Cemeteries of Abadiyeh and Hu), London, Special
Extra Publication of the Egypt Exploration Fund, 1901.
PowER, D., 'Some early surgical cases', Brit. J. Surg., 1933, 21, 1.
PuTscHAR, W. G. J., 'Problems in the Pathology and Palaeopathology of Bone', chapter in
Human Palaeopathology, ed. by S. Jarcho, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1966.
RACE, G. J., FRY, E. I., MATrrWS, J. L., WAGNER, M. J., MARTN, . H., and LYNN, J. A.,
'Ancient Nubian Human Bone: a chemical and ultrastructural characterization
including collagen', Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1968, 28, 157.
RowLuNG, J. T., 'Disease in Ancient Egypt: Evidence from Pathological Lesions found in
Mummies', M. D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1960.
ROWLuNG, J. T., 'Pathological changes in mummies, Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1961, 54, 409.
ROWLNG, J. T., 'Paraplegia', chapter 20 in Diseases in Antiquity, op. cit.
RuRm, M. A., 'On dwarfs and other deformed persons', Bull. Soc. Archeol. d'Alexandrie,
1911, 13, 1.
Rui'm, M. A., 'Arthritis deformans and spondylitis in Ancient Egypt', J. Path. Bact., 1918,
22, 152.
RUFFR, M. A., Studies in the Paleopathology ofEgypt, Chicago, University of Chicago Press,
RUFR, M. A., and R¶rrls, A., 'On osseous lesions in Ancient Egypt', J. Path. Bact., 1912,
16, 439.
SAMD, P., 'Orthopaedic and traumatic skeletal lesions in Ancient Egyptians', J. Bone Jt Surg.,
1962, 44B, 944.
SALB, P., 'Trauma and Disea of the Post Cranial Skeleton in Ancient Egypt', chapter 47 in
Diseases in Antiquity, op. cit.
SANDisoN, A. T., 'Degenerative Vascular Disea', chapter 39 in Diseases in Antiquity,
op. cit.
SANDsoN, A. T., 'Pathological changes in the skeletons of earlier populations due to acquired
disease and difficulties in their interpretation', in The Skeletal Biology of Earlier
Human Populations, ed. by D. R. Brothwell, London, Pergamon, 1968.
SimON, G., and ZORAD, P. A., 'The radiographic changes in alkaptonuric arthritis', Br. J.
Radiol., 1961, 34, 384.
STEDLER, A., 'Postgraduate lecture on orthopaedic diagnosis and indications', in Tuberculosis
of the Skeletal System, Section A, Volume III, Springfield, Thomas, 1952.
STEWART, T. D., 'Racial patterns in vertebral osteoarthritis', Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1947,
5, 433.
STEWART, T. D., 'Some problems in Human Palaeopathology', chapter in Human
Palaeopathology, op. cit.
STRAus, W. L., Jr., and CAVE, A. J. E., 'Pathology and posture of Neanderthal man', Q. Rev.
Biol., 1957, 32, 348.
WELR, C., Bones, Bodies and Disease, London, Thames & Hudson, 1964.
WILI, T. A., 'The age factor in hypertrophic arthritis', J. Bone Jt Surg., 1924, 6, 316.
ZoRAB, P. A., 'The historical and prehistorical background to ankylosing spondylitis',
Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1961, 54, 415.

jueves, 1 de marzo de 2012

Mummy discovery reveals ancient secrets

Fatiha Temmouri, Valley of the Kings,
A Swiss team has uncovered a mummy in Egypt’s Valley of the Kings – the first of its kind since the exhumation of Tutankhamen in 1922.
The Valley of the Kings is like a Holy Grail for Egyptologists. Situated on the west bank of the Nile, opposite Luxor, it is the burial site of many pharaohs and members of royal families or powerful nobles of the Egyptian Empire.

It was here, in 1922, that the most famous discovery in the history of Egyptology was made: the tomb of Tutankhamen, which until now has been the only intact example of its kind.

The latest find, which has created quite a stir, began on January 25, 2011, as part of clean-up work by a team of researchers from Basel University.

“On this famous January 25, we were cleaning a previously discovered tomb,” Susanne Bickel, professor at Basel University and head of the Swiss archaeological team, told

“We were building a low wall around the tomb when all of a sudden we hit the upper edge of something…”

Bickel said they first thought they were dealing with rubble or an unfinished building.

“Imagine our surprise when we realised it was probably another tomb. We’d never have thought two tombs could be so close to each another.”

But initially the find remained in the sand. At the beginning of 2011, Egypt was in full revolution; rumours of pillaging spread. Out of concerns for their safety, the team returned to Switzerland. A metal cover was placed over the opening to the tomb and the experts waited for a more favourable time to go exploring.

This turned out to be January 2012, when the team received official authorisation from the Egyptian authorities to carry on with the excavation.

“We were in a hurry to find out what was in the tomb,” Bickel said. “It took us four days to cross a well shaft. We managed to slide an arm in to take some photos with a camera. We saw an untouched tomb and a sarcophagus which was completely intact – unlike most of the ones we usually see.”

The team, protected from the searing desert sun by a tent, described a sarcophagus which was quite soberly decorated, without any embellishments.

“There’s no decoration on the sides,” said one researcher. “It’s very thick, very beautiful wood. We knew the tomb had been built in the 15th century BC, but we’ve discovered that the sarcophagus dates from the ninth century BC.”

This meant they could deduce two significant facts, he added.

“We’ve concluded from the fact that the tomb dates from the 15th century BC that there was a second burial 500 years later,” he said.

“Second, the simplicity of the sarcophagus makes us think that in the ninth century, during the 22nd Dynasty, a burial consisted of a humble sarcophagus and a simple stela [a sort of gravestone]. Unlike in the 15th century, during the 18th Dynasty, when ceramics and personal property were very popular.”

Having examined the inscriptions, which have yet to be completely decrypted, the scientists say they are dealing with a woman called Nehemes-Bastet, which means “May the goddess Bastet protect her”.

“What is astonishing is that the sarcophagus is two metres long, but the mummy, which is perfectly preserved, is only 1.55m,” Bickel said.

“We think the deceased was a singer for Amun-Ru [one of the most widely recorded Egyptian gods]. Her title shows she was part of the elite. She probably acted as a priestess from time to time during major processions.”

Bickel said it was the first time a tomb had been found in the Valley of the Kings of a woman who was not linked to the royal families.

The aim of the Basel University project is to analyse the non-royal tombs found in the side valley leading to the tomb of Thutmose III, the sixth pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty. Until now, these tombs have hardly been studied.

“Many are even completely unknown,” Bickel explained. “We search them, document their architecture and try to find among the tonnes of debris some signs that enable us to say what they were used for – and possibly the person or people who had the privilege of being buried in this valley, near the pharaohs.”

The discovery of the sarcophagus belonging to Amun-Ra’s singer turns the spotlight on another period of the valley’s history: that of the ninth century BC, when the tombs were re-used for a second time.

The mummy has yet to be analysed. Much remains to be learnt from the woman who escaped the pillages and struggles of the time to reach us intact and reveal a few of her secrets.

Fatiha Temmouri, Valley of the Kings,
(Translated from French by Thomas Stephens)